Personal Modular Robot

The two cloth climbing examples below inspire the idea of a modular personal robot which can detach from its base and climb onto the lap or even perhaps the bed of its user. The utility of a robot with these abilities presents multiple scenarios and health monitoring/telepresence possibilities for disabled and elderly people.

The base robot could be equipped to go up and down stairs or any other domestic terrain carrying its detachable haptic brother wherever required, both equipped with health related sensors, cameras, projectors and telepresence developments or any other relevant health or care related technology.

‘Robot and Frank’

Robot and Frank is a new film previewed at the Sundance Film Festival in January this year. It presents & investigates relationships between an elderly man with early stage Alzheimer’s, a health/social/care equipped humanoid robot and Frank’s family members – in short a future care network!

I get the feeling that this film may well be the first of many similar media inspired themes which will begin to change the way we see robotics and the spaces of care. It also makes you wonder who financed this film and where the money will come from for future films of this genre – its clearly a space where large robotic consortium’s can and will showcase their technology. For me this demonstrates the need for urgent and comprehensive research which takes into account the social, ethical & moral dilemmas ahead regarding the gathering commercialism of robotic care for the elderly.

Robotics related research & development is a commercially aimed endeavor and the advantages of changing popular perceptions of robotics in general is obvious and clearly underway. If I’m not mistaken the robot in this film is based on Honda’s ASIMO and Sony have recently been announced as the new distributors of this film.

Robot and Frank is due for release sometime later this year!

Eden Alternative – In the Community

After reading this article here I was interested to find out a little more about Professor Bill Thomas the founder of the Eden Alternative and its influence here in the UK. The Eden Alternative is a movement that is “dedicated to transforming care environments into habitats for human beings that promote quality of life for all involved”. The video below gives further insights into a philosophy that also extends out into the community to help elderly people living in their own homes.

I was however a little disappointed with some of the comments that Bill Thomas was quoted as saying regarding the Eden Alternative perspective in a recent interview about robots and elderly people;

“I can say with confidence that people in that reform movement really are not looking for a robot to solve our problems,”

I think I need to find out a bit more!

The idea of improving elderly people’s lives by addressing aspects of spatial, social & cultural well being is hardly new thinking and yet the Eden Alternative seems to epitomize and accordingly highlight the view that these essential moral, social & cultural responsibilities are not actually being maintained in contemporary elder care spaces – formal or informal?

However, as Sherry Turkle has maintained since the late 90′s the possibilities of emotional engagement with robots present a potential change in our social psychology and further to this perhaps, new distance oriented social networking arrangements. Perhaps Bill Thomas has not seen the robotic technology which is currently available and which may yet solve some of our problems – including the points highlighted in my previous post regarding care home abuse in the UK.

Care Home Abuse in the UK

In recent years the exposure of failing state aided services for the elderly has gathered pace in the UK. The video below taken from BBC’s Panorama is the latest and probably the most disturbing, gratuitous & shocking example we have seen to date.

It’s worrying to note however that this abuse was only exposed due to a hidden camera placed in Maria’s care home room by her concerned daughter.

The central question here then could be – why can’t we have wi-fi camera’s monitoring any vulnerable person in any care setting. The cost is minimal and yet the comfort of being able to look in on your elderly Mum or Dad whenever possible would be invaluable. Notwithstanding the benefits for the care facility itself and associated health services. There are of course privacy issues here but hardly insurmountable with recent developments in surveillance software & multi-agency protocols.

Maria was left in her room alone for 13 hours, every day without even a television switched on for company? Imagine the considerable benefits of a small remotely accessible personal companion robot which could not only project Skype style communication but also family video’s, photo’s, TV or even Maria’s favourite music. If this telepresence equipped social robot is also tactile and huggable, the haptic comforts of having a ‘daemon’ like presence are very clear. The combination of all these technologies into a working socially equipped companion robot is available now! As the brilliant LuminAR project shows below new technology can be inexpensive and easily adapted for this type of social robot!

A conveniently removable & washable tactile coat could finish off this personal companion style robot.

It has become all too painfully clear that we cannot leave the care of our vulnerable family members & friends exclusively to the ill equipped & inadequately regulated hands of state aided and commercial care?

Bullying on Motoring Forums – MBClub

I joined the MBClub.co.uk (for Mercedes-Benz owners & enthusiasts) a couple of months back after being given an old Mercedes for repair, MOT and maintenance and on my student allowance, a tough call? After a few months of help from some very knowledgeable and decent people I noticed a few persistent forum users who seemed to be bullying, intimidating and stifling people who were making some important points which clearly helped all forum club members – accordingly it seemed kind of strange? Why would enthusiastic club members (if they actually were of course) oppose posts which helped everyone on the forum?

After a problem was pointed out on an MBClub forum thread (now censored?) - you can see for yourself the bullying, rubbishing and intimidation which ensued? Fortunately,  I was able to ‘give as good as I got’ with the help of two or three other members!

After veiled threats such as ‘you could kill him‘ and a private message ‘you want to be more careful’ - along with the case that I was not happy being intimidated or bullied by reporting the first threat as advised – an administrator deleted most of my posts & threads and removed access.

For me this was pretty unpleasant & disappointing stuff!

In conclusion then it would appear that the ‘Motoring Forum’ is a place to tread warily, they may not always be what they first appear to be. They have questionable moderation & admin and even more questionable characters posting further demeaning (unpublishable) insults to this Blog?

MBClub… never again or even motoring enthusiast forums… which is a shame cos they were pretty good with some very helpful and admirable members!

Don’t accept bullies on your motoring forum!

OCULUS Laptop Robot

These are the kind of ideas which will make robots common place in our homes, simple and inexpensive – http://www.xaxxon.com/shop

This basic idea could be replicated with an iPhone as the ‘brains’ and Oculus could be replaced with more sophisticated, all terrain robot platforms which can climb or drive or even fly. For instance, the voice recognition of the iPhone could be utilised or even a small projector rather than a screen could be incorporated. Companion style robots could also be used with health and elder care modularity. Also interesting to know that OCULUS was funded through Kickstarter a community funding web site.

I get the feeling that anything is possible with the foundations of this idea. Just brilliant!

Care-O-Bot 3

These robots appear to have been produced with research from Prof Kerstin Dautehahn and her team at The Adaptive Systems Research Group (University of Herts) in collaboration with Fraunhofer IPA. To their credit they seem to be heading towards a commercially available open source product rather than hiding behind the usual robotics idiom of  ‘new research platform – apply here’ - (on further reading this is debatable!). I kind of like Care-O-Bot 3′s ‘technomorphic’ shape, despite its size but they’re clearly avoiding the humanoid issues and interaction seems pretty good. Some of the elderly adults in the video also appeared to like it so it definitely looks good on more than a few critical areas of HRI and robotic innovation.

I particularly like these robots roles as care assistants rather than care worker replacements so somewhat ethically sound too. It is however, not particularly companionable and clearly not designed as such, which conveniently stimulates a discussion regarding the shaping of robots for differing roles. A socially equipped, anti-anthropomorphic service robot like Care-O-Bot 3 looks functional so it does functional tasks (but not upstairs?), a social companion robot like Paro elicits emotional/haptic responses creating emotional attachments. So are there domestic spaces for both, certainly looks like it, particularly if they can communicate simultaneously with us and each other?

Fujitsu Teddy Bear Robot

At last an attempt to make a decent companion robot. Cute as he is though,  he doesn’t seem to actually do very much. He’s certainly not mobile and interaction is sadly lacking despite claims that he has the ability to recognise human emotion. I still get the feeling that these large corporations haven’t spent enough money on asking what people actually want from a robot, or why they might actually buy one, how they would use it etc. Ivory tower robotics rather than Interaction Design. I don’t understand why lessons haven’t been taken ‘on board’ from the slow computer uptake of seniors, if they didn’t make any sense to them or had any meaningful use, why would they bother tackling the steep technological learning curve?

The Paro model is particularly compelling but still suffers from the stigma of robot toy, as does this Bear but personal preferences combined with utility (for me) will become the so called ‘killer app’ in commercial robotics… the concept of the bespoke robot is getting nearer though.

UAS – Unmanned Aircraft Systems (European Legislation)

The European UAS legislation group are meeting on the 9.2.12 to discuss and quite probably enshrine laws to regulate the commercial and private use of flying robots (drones etc). As these robots become more affordable, sophisticated and available for private ownership (not withstanding commercial/authority use) legislation has become inevitable. The real interest here though is; could this legislation become the forerunner for legislation & regulation of social robots. Could it influence or even determine the way we accept robots into European airspace as well as society in general, whether flying, on wheels, tracks or even walking within our social, domestic, health and workplace spaces. For instance, could my telepresence mobile home robot go out and check on my car across the road or even perhaps go to my local shop for some milk causing a fatal accident? With Wifi and telepresence enabled navigation this is possible right now!

So how do we legislate against a robotic assault,  thief or spy when the defence offered is “somebody else hacked into my robot” or “it was an unforeseeable  technical glitch” let alone “no civilians were killed in this CIA drone attack”

OfficeBots

Anybots tele-presence robot extends the surveillance type model into the workplace. Perhaps the Panopticon effect will become the first major commercial breakthrough for mobile robots – not at $15,000 though?