Bibliography

Adey, P. (2008): ‘Architectural geographies of the airport balcony: mobility, sensation and the theatre of flight’, Geogr. Ann B 90 (1): 29–47.

Abbe Mowshowitz: Technology as excuse for questionable ethics. AI Soc. 22(3): 271-282 (2008)

Alexander, C. The timeless way of building. Oxford University Press, New York, 1979.

Andrews, G.J., Robin A. Kearns, Pia Kontos & Viv Wilson ‘Their finest hour’: older people, oral histories, and the historical geography of social life, Social & Cultural Geography, Vol. 7, No. 2, April 2006

Bailenson, J.N. & Yee, N. (in press). Virtual interpersonal touch: Haptic interaction and copresence in collaborative virtual environments. International Journal of Multimedia Tools and Applications.

Bartneck, C., Forlizzi, J. (2004). Shaping Human-Robot Interaction: Understanding the Social Aspects of Intelligent Robotic Products. Proceedings of the CHI2004 Conference, Vienna, pp. 1731-1732

Brown SR. A primer on Q methodology. Operant Subjectivity 1993;16(3/4): 91-138

Brouwer M. Q is accounting for tastes. Journal of Advertising Research 1999;39(2): 35-39

Baker S, 2000 The Postmodern Animal (Reaktion Books, London)

Balsiger, P. W, 2004, Supradisciplinary research practices: history, objectives and rationale Futures 36 407–21

Bekoff M, 2002 Minding Animals: Awareness, Emotions, and Heart (Oxford University Press, New York)

Bijker, W. E. and J. Law, Eds. (1992). Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge Ma, The MIT Press

Bruno Latour, (2004) ‘How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies’, Body and Society 10, pp. 205-229.

Ben Robins, Farshid Amirabdollahian, Ze Ji, Kerstin Dautenhahn (2010)a Tactile interaction with a humanoid robot for children with autism: A case study analysis involving user requirements and results of an initial implementation. Proceedings IEEE RO-MAN 2010, 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Sep. 12 – 15th, 2010, Viareggio, Italy

Bingham, N, 2006, ‘Bees, butterflies, and bacteria: biotechnology and the politics of nonhuman friendship’, Environment and Planning A, 38 pp483-498

Breazeal, C. (2009). “Role of expressive behaviour for robots that learn from people.” Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364(1535): 3527-3538.

Breazeal, C., D. Buchsbaum, et al. (2005). “Learning from and about others: towards using imitation to bootstrap the social understanding of others by robots.” Artif Life 11(1-2): 31-62.

B. R. Duffy, G. Joue, and J. Bourke, “Issues in assessing performance of social robots,” in WSEAS International Conference on Robotics, Skiathos Island, Greece, 2002.

Braun, B, 2008, Environmental issues: inventive life Progress in Human Geography 32 667–79

Bugmann, G., The What and When of Service Robotics. Industrial Robot, 2005. 32(6): p. 437.

Butcher, S., & Wilton, R. (2008). Stuck in transition? Exploring the spaces of employment

training for youth with intellectual disability. Geoforum, 39, 1079-1092.

Burr, V. (l995) An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.

Callon, M. (1986). “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation – Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St-Brieuc Bay.” Sociological Review Monograph: 196-233.

Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility. A Sociology of Monsters? Essays on Power, Technology and Domination. J. Law. London, Routledge: 132-161.

Callon, M. and B. Latour (1992). Don’t Throw the Baby Out with the Bath School! A Reply to Collins and Yearley. Science as Practice and Culture. A. Pickering. Chicago, Chicago University Press: 343-368.

Chomsky, Noam (1959) A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. [Journal (Paginated)]

Churchland, P. M. (1989). A Neurocomputational Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cloke et al. 2004. Envisioning Human Geographies. London: Arnold, 2004.

Cloke, P. J. (2001). Practising human geography. London, SAGE.

Cloke, P. J. and R. J. Johnston (2005). Spaces of geographical thought : deconstructing human geography’s binaries. London, SAGE.

Cloke, P. J., C. Philo, et al. (1991). Approaching human geography : an introduction to contemporary theoretical debates. London, Chapman.

Copleston S.N. and Bugmann G. (2008) Technical Report 08-01, Robotics and Intelligent Systems, University of Plymouth, UK

Cramer et al, (2009). ‘Give me a hug’: the effects of touch and autonomy

on people’s responses to embodied social agents. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, Volume 20, Numbers 2-3, pp. 437-445(9), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Duffy, B.R., Joue, G., Bourke, J. “Issues in Assessing Performance of Social Robots“, 2nd WSEAS International Conference on Robotics, Distance Learning and Intelligent Communication Systems, Skiathos Island, Greece, September 25-28, 2002.

Edward Cheung, Vladimir J. Lumelsky: A sensitive skin system for motion control of robot arm manipulators, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 10 (1992) 9-32 9, Elsevier.

Foucault, M. (1976). The birth of the Clinic. [S.l.], Tavistock Publications.

Fukushima, M., Masuda, R.: Stimulus Distinction in the Skin of a Robot Using Tactile and Shock Sensors,  IEEJ Transactions on Electronics, Information and Systems 2008, pp.469-476

Gates, Bill. “A Robot In Every Home” Scientific American. January 2007.  10 Feb 2008 http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=9312A198-E7F2-99DF 31DA639D6C4BA567&page=1

Gergen, K.J. (l994) Reality and relationships, soundings in social construction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Gergen, K. J. (1995) ‘Relational Theory and the Discourses of Power’, in D. M. Hosking, H. P. Dachler and K. J. Gergen (eds) Management and Organization.

Gergen, K.J. (1996) Technology and the self: From the essential to the sublime. In D. Grodin and T. Lindlof (Eds.) Constructing the self in a mediated age. Beverly Hills. Sage. pp. 127-140.

Glaser, Barney G. Emergence vs. Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press, 1992.

Graham Harman, (2007), On Actors, Networks, and Plasma: Heidegger vs. Latour vs. Heidegger, American University in Cairo & University of Amsterdam, ISRF, ISI Group, LSE

Haard, Michael. 1993. Beyond harmony and consensus: A social conflict approach to technology. Science, Technology, and Human Values 18:408-32.

Haraway D, (2007), When Species Meet (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN)

Harrison S, Massey, D, Richards, K, Magilligan F, Thrift N and Bender B 2004 Thinking across the divide: perspectives on the conversations between physical and human geography Area 36 435–42

Harper, S. and Laws, G. (1995) Rethinking the geography of ageing, Progress in Human Geography 19: 199–221.

Hillman, M. (ed.) (1993) Children, Transport and the Quality of Life. London: Policy Studies Institute.

Hinchliffe, S, 2008, Reconstituting nature conservation: towards a careful political ecology Geoforum 39 88–97

Hine, C. (ed) (2005) Virtual Methods: Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Berg.

Hine, C. (2008) Virtual ethnography In L.M. Given (ed.) Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Sage

Jones, P. & Macdonald, N. (2007) Getting it wrong first time: building an interdisciplinary research relationship Area 39;4, 490-498

Johnsson, M., & Balkenius, C. (2007). LUCS Haptic Hand III – An Anthropomorphic Robot Hand with Proprioception. LUCS Minor 13.

John Law (2007), ‘Making a Mess with Method’, in William Outhwaite and Stephen P. Turner (eds), The Sage Handbook of Social Science Methodology, Sage: Beverly Hills and London, pp 595-606

John Law, ‘Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics,’ version of 25th April 2007, available at:

http://www. heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2007ANTandMaterialSemiotics.pdf, (downloaded on 18th May, 2007).

K. Dautenhahn. Methodology & themes of human-robot interaction: A growing research field.International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2007.

K. Dautenhahn, E. Ferrari, B. Robins, (2010)b “Does it work?” A framework to evaluate the effectiveness of a robotic toy for children with special needs. Proceedings IEEE RO-MAN 2010, 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Sep. 12 – 15th, 2010, Viareggio, Italy

Kerstin Severinson Eklundh, Anders Green, Helge Hüttenrauch, (2003) Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3-4): 223-234.

Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(1), 28-52

Key Market Drivers Report (2004) has been renamed ”The Annual Semiconductor Application Markets Report”. Obtainable from: Future Horizon, Blakes Green Cottage, Stone Street, Near Seal, Sevenoaks, Kent TN15 0LQ, UK. http://www.futurehorizons.com/

K Dautenhahn, S Woods, C Kaouri, M Walters, K L Koay, I Werry (2005) What is a Robot Companion – Friend, Assistant or Butler?, Proc. IROS 2005, IEEE IRS/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, August 2-6, 2005, Edmonton, Alberta Canada, pp. 1488-1493.

K. Dautenhahn, “Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot-Interaction: A Growing Research Field”, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, Special Issue on Human-Robot-Interaction,Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 103-108 , 2007

K. Wada, T. Shibata., (2008) Social and physiological influences of living with seal robots in an elderly care house for two months. Gerontechnology; 7(2):235

Kitano, N. (2005), Roboethics – a comparative analysis of social acceptance of robots between the West and Japan -, The Waseda Journal of Social Sciences, Vol 6. Tokyo. Available at http://www.roboethics.org

Klein, H. K., & Kleinman, D. L. (2002). The social construction of technology: Structural considerations. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(1), 28-52

K. M. Lee, Y. Jung, J. Kim, and S. R. Kim. Are physically embodied social agents

better than disembodied social agents? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(10):962–973, 2006.

K.O. Arras and D. Cerqui (2005) “Do we want to share our lives and bodies with robots? A 2000 people survey.” Technical report Nr. 0605-001. Autonomous Systems Lab. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL).

K. Wada, et al., (2005) Effects of Robot Therapy for Demented Patients

Evaluated by EEG, Proc. the IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. IROS, pp.2205-2210,.

Krell, D. F. (1992). Daimon life : Heidegger and life-philosophy / David Farrel Krell. Bloomington, :, Indiana University Press.

Law, J. (1991). Introduction: Monsters, Machines and Sociotechnical Relations. A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. J. Law. London, Routledge: 1-23.

Law, J. (1992). “Notes on the Theory of the Actor Network – Ordering, Strategy, and Heterogeneity.” Systems Practice 5(4): 379-393.

Law, J. and M. Callon (1992). The Life and Death of an Aircraft: A Network Analysis of Technical Change. Shaping technology/building society: studies in sociotechnical change. W. E. Bijker and J. Law. Cambridge Ma, The MIT Press: 21-52.

Law, J. (2004). After Method: mess in social science research Routledge.

Law, J. and J. Hassard, Eds. (1999). Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers / The Sociological Review.

Lawson, S.; Chesney, T.(2008)., “Catz, Dogz & Robotz? Human interaction with domestic robotic devices”, Journal of Physical Agents, Vol.2(2), pp.1-2.

Latour, B. (1986). The Powers of Association. Power, Action and Belief: a New Sociology of Knowledge? J. Law: 264-280.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1992). Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In: W. Bijker and J. Law, Shaping Technology/Building Society (pp.225 – 258). Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press

Latour, Bruno. (1996). Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Latour, B. (1996). “On actor-network theory – A few clarifications.” Soziale Welt-Zeitschrift Fur Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung Und Praxis 47(4):

Latour, B. (1999). On Recalling ANT. Actor Network Theory and After. J. Law and J. Hassard. Oxford, Blackwell Publishers / The Sociological Review: 15-25.

Latour, B. (1999) Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA [etc]: Harvard University Press

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social : an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford ; New York, Oxford University Press

Lawson, S.; Chesney, T.(2008)., “Catz, Dogz & Robotz? Human interaction with domestic robotic devices”, Journal of Physical Agents, Vol.2(2), pp.1-2

Lee, K. M., Peng, W., Yan, C., & Jin, S. (2006). Can Robots Manifest Personality?: An Empirical Test of Personality Recognition, Social Responses, and Social Presence in Human-Robot Interaction. Journal of Communication, 56, 754-772.

Lee, K. M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14, 27–50

 

Lorimer, H, 2006, Herding memories of humans and animals. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 24 497–518

 

Lorimer J, 2008 Counting corncrakes: The affective science of corncrake surveillance, Social Studies of Science, 38 377-405, doi: 10.1177/0306312707084396

Lorimer J, 2007 Nonhuman charisma, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24 (5) 911 – 932, doi:10.1068/d71j

Lorimer J, 2010, Elephants as companion species: the lively biogeographies of Asian elephant conservation in Sri Lanka, forthcoming Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers October 2010

Lorimer J, 2010, Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies, Cultural Geographies, 17 237-258 DOI: 10.1177/1474474010363853 AND An erratum

Lulka, D. (2009), The residual humanism of hybridity: retaining a sense of the earth. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34: 378–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00346.x

 

MacEachren, A. M. 2001a, Cartography and GIS: Extending collaborative tools to support virtual teams. Progress in Human Geography, 25(3), 431-444

Millen, David R. (2000): Rapid Ethnography: Time Deepening Strategies for HRI Field Research. In: Proceedings of DIS00: Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques 2000. pp. 280-286.

Mori, M. The Buddha in the robot. Boston: Tuttle Publishing, 1982.

 

Mutlu, B. & Forlizzi, J. (2008). Robots in Organizations: Workflow, Social, and Environmental Factors in Human-Robot Interaction. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’ 08), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Mutlu, B. (2006). An Empirical Framework for Designing Social Products. In Doctoral Consortium Extended Abstracts of the 2006 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS’06), University Park, PA.

Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Norman, Donald A. (1988): The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York, Basic Books.

Patterson, Mark, (2007), The Senses of Touch: Haptics, Affects and Technologies, Berg Publishers.

Paterson, M. 2006b: ‘Seeing with the hands’: blindness, touch and the Enlightenment spatial imaginary. British Journal of Visual Impairment 242, 52–60.

— 2006c: Seeing with the hands, touching with the eyes: vision, touch and the Enlightenment spatial imaginary. The Senses and Society 12, 224–42.

Paterson, M. 2007: The senses of touch: haptics, affects

and technologies. Oxford: Berg.

— 2008: Digital craft, digital touch: haptics and design. In Hawk, B., Rieder, D. and Oviedo, O., editors, Small tech: the culture of digital tools, Minneapolis, MN:

University of Minnesota Press.

— 2009: Remediating touch. Editorial in special issue ‘Re-mediating touch’. The Senses and Society 2(3), in press.

Paterson, M., (2009), Electric Snakes and Mechanical Ladders? Social presence, domestic spaces, and human-robot interactions (in Press)

Peter H. Kahn Jr., Nathan G. Freier, Takayuki Kanda, Hiroshi Ishiguro, Jolina H. Ruckert, Rachel L. Severson, Shaun K. Kane: Design patterns for sociality in human-robot interaction. HRI 2008: 97-104.

Philo, C., Parr, H., Burns, N., 2005. ‘‘An Oasis for us”: ‘in-between’ spaces of training for people with mental health problems in the Scottish Highlands. Geoforum 36, 778–91.

Pinch, Trevor, and  Bijker., (1987) The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology, edited by Wiebe Bijker, Thomas Hughes, and Trevor Pinch, 17-50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Pink, S. (2007) Doing Visual Ethnography: images, media and representation in research London: Sage. Revised and expanded 2nd edition. London: Sage. ISBN 0761960546

Richard S. Rosenberg: The social impact of intelligent artefacts. AI Soc. 22(3): 367-383 (2008)

 

Rose G (2007) Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Interpreting Visual Materials, second edition, Sage

 

Rowles, G.D. 1978: Reflections on experiential fieldwork. In Ley, D. and Samuels, M., editors, Humanistic

geography: prospects and problemsi, New York: Wiley, 173–93.

Rowles, G.D. 1980: Toward a geography of growing old. In Buttimer, A. and Seamon, D., editors, The human experience of space and place, London: Croom Helm, 55–72.

Rowles, G.D. (1986) The geography of ageing and the aged: towards an integrated perspective, Progress in Human Geography 10: 511–539.

R. S. Rosenberg, “The Social Impact of Intelligent Artifacts”. AI & Society , Vol. 22, 2008, pp. 367-383.

Salter, T., Dautenhahn, K. & te Boekhorst, R. (2006). Learning about natural human-robot interaction styles, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 54(2), 127-134

Sarah Moser, (2008), Personality: a new positionality? Area,  40.3, 383–392

Sawicki, Jana (1991), Disciplining Foucault. Feminism, Power, and the Body. Rutledge, New York, 1991.

Schillmeier, M. (2008), Actor-networks of dementia. The Sociological Review, 56: 139–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.00820.x

Smith, N.W.,  Current systems in psychology: history, theory, research, and applications. Wadsworth. 2001

Spencer T, Whatmore S, 2001 “Editorial: Bio-geographies: putting life back into the discipline” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 24, 139-141

Stephenson, W. Correlating persons instead of tests. Character and Personality 1935;4: 17-24

Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative research for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Someya Takao; Kato Yusaku; Sekitani Tsuyoshi; Iba Shingo; Noguchi Yoshiaki; Murase Yousuke; Kawaguchi Hiroshi; Sakurai Takayasu: Conformable, flexible, large-area networks of pressure and thermal sensors with organic transistor active matrixes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005;102(35):12321-5.

Steve Yohanan, Karon E. MacLean, A Tool to Study Affective Touch: Goals & Design of the Haptic Creature, University of British Columbia, Canada – CHI 2009

Stricklin, W. R., J. Z. Zhou, and H. W. Gonyou. (1995). Selfish animats and robot ethology: Using artificial animals to investigate social and spatial behavior. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 44:187-203.

S. Yohanan and K.E. MacLean. The haptic creature project: Social human-robot interaction through affective touch. In Proceedings AISB’08, pages 7–11, 2008.

Thrift, Nigel, (2004), Electric Animals: New models of everyday life? Cultural studies 18:2-32-3, 461-482, Routledge,.

Thrift, Nigel, (2002) “The future of Geography”, Geoforum, 33, 291-298.

Thompson, Lee and Cupples, Julie, 2008, ‘Seen and not heard? Text messaging and digital sociality’, Social & Cultural Geography, 9(1), pp. 95-108.

T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, K. Dautenhahn,  A survey of socially interactive robots, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42,(3–4) (2003) 143–166

T. Murphy, ‘Quantum ontology: a virtual mechanics of becoming’, in E. Kaufman and K. Heller, eds, Deleuze and Guattari: new mappings in politics, philosophy and culture (Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1998), p. 213.

Turkle, Sherry, (2005)a, Relational Artifacts/Children/Elders: The Complexities of

CyberCompanions, in: Proceedings of the CogSciWorkshop on Android Science

(2005), pp. 56–61.

Turkle, S. 2005b. “Caring Machines: Relational Artifacts for the Elderly.” Keynote AAAI Workshop, “Caring Machines.” Washington, D.C.

V. Maheshwari, R.F. Saraf; “High Resolution Thin Film Device to Sense Texture by Touch”, Science, 312, 1501-1504 June 2006.

Vikkelsø, S: Subtle Redistribution of Work, Attention and Risks: Electronic Patient Records and Organizational Consequences, Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 2005,17(1) 3-30.

Wada, K., T. Shibata, et al. (2006). Long-term Interaction between Seal Robots and Elderly People — Robot Assisted Activity at a Health Service Facility for the Aged —. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Autonomous Minirobots for Research and Edutainment (AMiRE 2005). K. Murase, K. Sekiyama, T. Naniwa, N. Kubota and J. Sitte, Springer Berlin Heidelberg: 325-330.

Wallach, L. and Wallach, M.A. (1994) Gergen versus the mainstream: Are hypotheses in social psychology subject to empirical test? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 67, 223-242.

Warnes, A.M. (1981) Towards a geographical contribution to gerontology, Progress in Human Geography

5(2): 317–341.

Warnes, A.M. (1990) Geographical questions in gerontology:needed directions for research, Progress in Human

Geography 14: 24–56

Warren, C. R., Perspectives on the `alien’ versus `native’ species debate: a critique of concepts, language and practice, Progres in Human Geography, August 2007, vol. 31 no. 4 427-446

Whatmore, Sarah and Thorne, Lorraine (2000) ‘Elephants on the move: spatial formations of wildlife exchange’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18: 185–203.

Whatmore, Sarah, ‘Materialist returns: practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world’, Cultural Geographies , vol. 13, no. 4, 600-609 (2006).

Whatmore S, 2002 Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces (Sage, London)

Williams, Robin, and David Edge. (1996). The Social Shaping of Technology. Research Policy 25:865-99.

Ziemke (2001)a. Disentangling Notions of Embodiment. In: Pfeifer, Lungarella & Westermann (eds.) Developmental and Embodied Cognition – Workshop Proceedings. Edinburgh, UK.

Ziemke (2001)b. Are Robots Embodied?. In: Balkenius, Zlatev, Dautenhahn, Kozima, Breazeal (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics – Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems (pp. 75-83). Lund University Cognitive Studies, vol. 85. Lund, Sweden

Ziemke (2007). The Embodied Self – Theories, hunches and robot models. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(7), 167–79.

2 thoughts on “Bibliography

  1. Al Swerdloff says:

    I had been honored to receive a call coming from a friend when he identified the important guidelines shared on your own site. Looking at your blog article is a real amazing experience. Many thanks for taking into account readers much like me, and I wish you the best of achievements like a professional in this field.

  2. Big thanks for your comments Al

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: